hi, i'v set a Member Status to Blocked in Backend -> Monitor -> Members

but the Photos,Album from blocked Member are still shown and not hidden!? if a member now click on blocked member -> Album in All Photos then he is redirect to /index.php?option=com_community&view=photos without Itemid in Url!

i think Content from Blocked Members should not vissible to other Members and also blocked/hidden!

Hi.

You didn't "blocked" member here but disabled his/her accound.
Disabled member = unactive member. User can't login but all his content remain untouched.
This is used to ban users temporarily. If you want to remove user you need to delete him/her.

If you think that this feature should work in different way, please post it here:
uservoice.jomsocial.com/forums/101561-jo...ial-feature-requests

Michal wrote: Hi.

You didn't "blocked" member here but disabled his/her accound.
Disabled member = unactive member. User can't login but all his content remain untouched.
This is used to ban users temporarily. If you want to remove user you need to delete him/her.

If you think that this feature should work in different way, please post it here:
uservoice.jomsocial.com/forums/101561-jo...ial-feature-requests

hi, for me it makes no sense that content of "temporarily baned users" are still showed to other Members!

for example:

if they click on Profile Link within "baned User" Photo Album then they got redirect to a page where is nothing showed except the JS toolbar and a Message --> User not exist..!

also photo module show image thumbs from banned Users..e.t.c

Hi.

It's a huge difference: they are just blocked and not deleted. Their content is valid but can't be reached till user is in that state. Blocked/banned user maybe just fall from grace and could be back... why his content should be deleted? Also content he/she posted was abusive or copy right violate and they needs to saved as a proof?

User content will be removed ONLY if user is deleted.

So i rather recommend to change "User not exist" to "This user is blocked" using language override.

Michal wrote: Hi.

It's a huge difference: they are just blocked and not deleted. Their content is valid but can't be reached till user is in that state. Blocked/banned user maybe just fall from grace and could be back... why his content should be deleted? Also content he/she posted was abusive or copy right violate and they needs to saved as a proof?

i unterstand your explanation very well Michal, but i do not asked about delete..i asked about a way to hide Content from temporarily Blocked User for other User..that's all ;-)

Hi.

Then you ask for new feature :) Here on forum we don't develop new feature. You need to post a new feature request and gather votes.
I'm happy to help with customizations that doesn't require core files to hack... but this here is really out of scope our technical support.

Michal wrote: Hi.

Then you ask for new feature :) Here on forum we don't develop new feature. You need to post a new feature request and gather votes.
I'm happy to help with customizations that doesn't require core files to hack... but this here is really out of scope our technical support.

hi Michel, i do not ask for new features, i simply ask for a basic functionality! please report this to dev's,,

Hi.

If you want certain feature that isn't present in current release, then it's NEW feature... wherever you call it BASIC or not.
Please, read our Support Policy:

www.jomsocial.com/support

Changing the current functionality - JomSocial is delivered as is. All of its functions have been tested to work in common Joomla environments.
Changing the current functionality to achieve different behavior is not something we recommend. We don’t support it.
Adding new functionality - No matter how trivial, adding anything to the current base always requires time.